1963 Holden EJ vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1506 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
Model | EJ | 100 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3480 mm |