1963 Holden EJ vs. 2004 Saleen S7
To start off, 2004 Saleen S7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 486 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saleen S7 weights approximately 113 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2004 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Holden | Saleen |
| Model | EJ | S7 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2692 mm |
