1963 Holden EJ vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 536 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | EJ | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |
