1963 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Ascari KZ1

To start off, 2005 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 436 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2005 Ascari KZ1
Make Holden Ascari
Model EJ KZ1
Year Released 1963 2005
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2262 cc 4941 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 64 HP 500 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 550 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1138 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2636 mm