1963 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EJ | Outlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 220 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |