1963 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Scion xB
To start off, 2005 Scion xB is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xB (108 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 48 kg more than 2005 Scion xB.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2005 Scion xB | |
Make | Holden | Scion |
Model | EJ | xB |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |