1963 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Toyota Sparky
To start off, 2005 Toyota Sparky is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Sparky (86 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sparky should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 64 kg more than 2005 Toyota Sparky.
Because 2005 Toyota Sparky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sparky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Sparky. (130 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Sparky.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2005 Toyota Sparky | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EJ | Sparky |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1900 mm |
