1963 Holden EJ vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | EJ | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
