1963 Holden EJ vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 372 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2006 Jeep Wrangler
Make Holden Jeep
Model EJ Wrangler
Year Released 1963 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 2425 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 147 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 224 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1506 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2380 mm