1963 Holden EJ vs. 2006 Smart ForFour

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 156 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2006 Smart ForFour
Make Holden Smart
Model EJ ForFour
Year Released 1963 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 978 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2510 mm