1963 Holden EJ vs. 2006 Volkswagen Transporter
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter (104 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Transporter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2006 Volkswagen Transporter | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | EJ | Transporter |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1894 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |