1963 Holden EJ vs. 2007 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2007 Ford Falcon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Falcon weights approximately 447 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2007 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | EJ | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2930 mm |