1963 Holden EJ vs. 2007 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2007 Saturn Outlook is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Saturn Outlook (268 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Saturn Outlook (335 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2007 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2007 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Holden | Saturn |
| Model | EJ | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |
