1963 Holden EJ vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 123 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | EJ | HR-V |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |
