1963 Holden EJ vs. 2008 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Forester weights approximately 291 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Subaru Forester (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2008 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2008 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | EJ | Forester |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |