1963 Holden EJ vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 86 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | EJ | Jazz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 77 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 110 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |