1963 Holden EJ vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Holden | Peugeot |
Model | EJ | 408 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |