1963 Holden EJ vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2011 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EJ | R |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5156 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1661 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3216 mm |