1963 Holden EJ vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | EJ | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |