1963 Holden EJ vs. 2012 Audi A1

To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A1 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 94 kg more than 2012 Audi A1.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2012 Audi A1
Make Holden Audi
Model EJ A1
Year Released 1963 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 1968 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1040 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 3954 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1416 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2469 mm