1963 Holden EJ vs. 2012 Suzuki Alto

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Alto is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Alto (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Alto should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 249 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Alto.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Alto. (90 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Alto.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2012 Suzuki Alto
Make Holden Suzuki
Model EJ Alto
Year Released 1963 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 90 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 885 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2360 mm