1963 Holden EJ vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 131 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Holden | Mini |
Model | EJ | Cooper |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2547 mm |