1963 Holden EJ vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 346 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Holden | Mini |
| Model | EJ | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2595 mm |
