1963 Holden FB Special vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden FB Special weights approximately 440 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden FB Special | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FB Special | Elan |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2140 mm |