1963 Holden FB Special vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1963 Holden FB Special. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden FB Special.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden FB Special.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden FB Special | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | FB Special | UTE |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |