1963 Humber Sceptre vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Humber Sceptre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Humber Sceptre (78 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Humber Sceptre should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Humber Sceptre weights approximately 350 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Humber Sceptre | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Humber | Zastava |
Model | Sceptre | 102 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2160 mm |