1963 Humber Sceptre vs. 1989 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1989 Mercury Sable is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mercury Sable weights approximately 276 kg more than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Because 1963 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Humber Sceptre | 1989 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Humber | Mercury |
| Model | Sceptre | Sable |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
