1963 Humber Sceptre vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Because 1963 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (124 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Humber Sceptre | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Humber | Holden |
| Model | Sceptre | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2685 mm |
