1963 Innocenti IM 3 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Innocenti IM 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Innocenti IM 3 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Innocenti IM 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Innocenti IM 3. (56 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1963 Innocenti IM 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Innocenti IM 3 weights approximately 434 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Innocenti IM 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Innocenti IM 3. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Innocenti IM 3.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Innocenti IM 3 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Innocenti | Lotus |
Model | IM 3 | Extreme |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2420 mm |