1963 Innocenti IM 3 vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Innocenti IM 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Innocenti IM 3 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XF weights approximately 460 kg more than 1963 Innocenti IM 3.
Because 2003 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Innocenti IM 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Innocenti IM 3 | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Innocenti | Jaguar |
| Model | IM 3 | XF |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |
