1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Bellel | 220 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 6.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2850 mm |