1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 366 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | Bellel | Minx |
Year Released | 1963 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |