1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Bellel | 300 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 71 L |