1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 320 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Bellel | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |