1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1976 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1976 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. (33 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 862 kg more than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. (39 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1976 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Bellel | Minica |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 357 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 39 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
