1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1978 Peugeot 305
To start off, 1978 Peugeot 305 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1978 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 255 kg more than 1978 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Peugeot 305. (94 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1978 Peugeot 305 | |
Make | Isuzu | Peugeot |
Model | Bellel | 305 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 67.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |