1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 42 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
Model | Bellel | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |