1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 1985 Mazda 323 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 72 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 270 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Bellel | 323 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1640 mm |
