1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1988 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1988 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 5 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1988 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Isuzu | Plymouth |
| Model | Bellel | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |
