1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 92 kg more than 1998 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (294 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1998 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Bellel | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2430 mm |