1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166

To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (226 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 178 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (275 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Isuzu Bellel 2000 Alfa Romeo 166
Make Isuzu Alfa Romeo
Model Bellel 166
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 2959 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 55 HP 226 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 121 Nm 275 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.7:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1332 kg 1510 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2710 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]