1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2001 Kia Visto
To start off, 2001 Kia Visto is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2001 Kia Visto. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 2001 Kia Visto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 370 kg more than 2001 Kia Visto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Kia Visto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Kia Visto. (74 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Kia Visto. 2001 Kia Visto has automatic transmission and 1963 Isuzu Bellel has manual transmission. 1963 Isuzu Bellel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Kia Visto will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2001 Kia Visto | |
| Make | Isuzu | Kia |
| Model | Bellel | Visto |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2390 mm |
