1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 363 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Isuzu | Mahindra |
Model | Bellel | Bolero |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1695 kg |