1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (149 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Isuzu | Mini |
Model | Bellel | Cooper |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |