1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 115 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Bellel | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |