1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 203 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Bellel | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |