1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 239 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Etude (163 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Etude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Bellel | Etude |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1839 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1093 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |