1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (148 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (350 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Isuzu | Honda |
Model | Bellel | Civic |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |