1963 Isuzu Bellett vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellett (120 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellett should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellett weights approximately 150 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellett | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Isuzu | Lotus |
Model | Bellett | Elan |
Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 59 L |