1963 Isuzu Bellett vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellett (120 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellett should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellett | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
Model | Bellett | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2380 mm |